Do energy-pollution-resource-transport taxes yield double dividend for Nordic economies?

With the policy performance of Nordic countries especially from aspects energy security, equity, and environmental sustainability, this study provides more in-depth on countries’ disaggregated taxes. To examine greenhouse gas emission intensity effects tax, pollution resource transport tax alongside controlling for role employment rate gross domestic product over period 1995–2020, empirical tools such as method moments quantile regression, short- long-run cointegration, Granger causality approaches were utilized. Importantly, there are series interesting results investigation. Firstly, result posits feasibility Green growth in panel while a significant negative nexus between GDP was also established. Secondly, result, we found that only significantly mitigates both emissions across quantiles exacerbate intensity. Thus, case, could validate double dividend hypothesis. Thirdly, revealed hypothesis by large extent co-benefit is achievable with policies Finland but short-run. Similarly, pollution, resource, Sweden all desirable achieving economic benefits However, no valid evidence to support validity Denmark Norway. Lastly, one-way GDP, exists Overall, compelling dimensions inferred • Co-benefits energy-pollution-resource-transport countries. There decarbonisation region. Only yields benefit estimation. Double policies. For Sweden, dividend.